UK case law
Graham Garner v The Information Commissioner
[2023] UKFTT GRC 411 · First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights · 2023
The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Full judgment
3. On 25 March 2023, the Tribunal received an application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal the decision of the Tribunal which was promulgated on 27 February 2023. To the extent required, I extend time and admit the application
4. The Applicant applies for permission to appeal on a number of grounds. He submits that the Tribunal decision is not accurate or impartial and that the facts are presented in a way which puts the Applicant in an unfavourable light and the public authority, Shardlow & Great Wilne Parish Council, in a favourable light. The Applicant submits that the Tribunal demonstrates unjustified sympathy for the Council and its officers and he makes further accusations about their conduct and honesty. He submits that some paragraphs of the decision are contradictory.
5. Appeals from the First-tier Tribunal to the Upper Tribunal can be made only if there is an arguable error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s decision. It is not possible to appeal simply because you do not agree with the decision. “Arguable” means that there must be a realistic (as opposed to fanciful) prospect of success – see Lord Woolf MR in Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd [1997] 1 WLR 1538 .
6. I have concluded that there is no arguable error of law in the Tribunal’s decision. The Tribunal gave detailed reasons for its decision and the findings of fact on which that decision was based. The fact that the Applicant disagrees with those findings does not mean that the Tribunal erred in law. The findings were reasonably open to the Tribunal on the evidence before it and I find no evidence of bias or impartiality. I am satisfied that the relevant law has been interpreted and applied to the facts correctly.
7. Accordingly, permission to appeal is refused.
8. The Applicant is entitled to renew his application to the Upper Tribunal.
9. I note that the Applicant has also applied to the Tribunal for its Order to be enforced against the Council and understand that this application has been referred to a Registrar.